An update for Burning skies was released today. In the changelog were only multiplayer fixes. Hopefully this will allow me to finally play a game of multiplayer. I'll be back with results in a few.
So, I finally got to play a multiplayer game, and I'm disappointed. It was like playing Resistance Fall of Man's multiplayer with only eight people spread out with barely any action.

Yea, i think im going to skip RBS, it looks really shit to be honest, better games to spend my money on...

lol i knew this was gnna suck some1 told me it dont have clans or chatboxes. you guys that did all this rbs mking sound cool made a big deal about this gm i honestly would just go back to RR one more time for a bit.

This game is 3 years more advanced than RR but in my opinion (from what i seen and heard) not half as good

On the singleplayer side, the game is almost Resistance 3 mobilized. That's good, as Resistance 3 was pretty good and much better than 2.

story sucked

xXTrueZaneXx- wrote:

lol i knew this was gnna suck some1 told me it dont have clans or chatboxes. you guys that did all this rbs mking sound cool made a big deal about this gm i honestly would just go back to RR one more time for a bit.

Chatbox isn't needed bro,and about the clans,there will be a update involving that issue.every game has its issues when it's first released lol
But I would like to know the amount of players daily rbs receives ...

In All Seriousness, The Games Simply Sucks, Nihilistic Games Failed, The Average Review Score Was About 5 (RR Was About 9)
The Touch Screen Features Look Like They Could Get Pretty Frustrating Or Something xD
I Have No Reason To Get A Vita Yet Because There Are NO Games For It That I Would Want To Play, I'll Probably Start With AC Liberation In October =D

The story is decent, it's not terrible. MLB 12 is still my favorite Vita game so far, but I only have Resistance, Uncharted, and MLB.

Jasoon wrote:

This game is 3 years more advanced than RR but in my opinion (from what i seen and heard) not half as good

This game isn't advanced. RR is based on an engine from 6 years ago. Go figure.

The engine can be really old, but the game still be great. Many great games are based on really old engines.

All i'm saying is RR is alot better than RBS, and graphics don't really mean much these days, look at COD...Minecraft....

Great video games are hard to come by on this console generation. There are lots of good games, but few that are truly great.

Like The Yakuza Series, So Underrated, 90% Of Gamers Don't Even Know What Yakuza Is...=(

im part of the afore mentioned 90%

It's A Japanese Game, Brought To US Because Of People Demanding It From SEGA For Years...It's Still In Japanese But Just English Subtitles, Without A Doubt The Best Story Mode There Will Ever Be In A Game
YAKUZA 5 Out In Japan In December, Looks Awesome, New Graphics Engine!

My favorite story ever in terms of storyline is Red Dead Redemption. It's the only video game I've ever played that actually made me sad enough to cry. I didn't, but I sure could have haha

Yea, Red Dead Redemption Was Rockstar At Their Best...Undead Nightmare Was The Best DLC/Expansion Ever Created In My Opinion

I still havent gotten Undead Nightmare, I amost did last week but didnt go through

The Multiplayer Is The Same Map/Place But With Lots Of Additional Items And The Campaign Is Awesome But I Won't Spoil Anything =)

budroothedog wrote:

The engine can be really old, but the game still be great. Many great games are based on really old engines.

That's not what I replied to.
I replied because someone said that RR was more advanced. An advanced game requires an advanced engine. It's VERY unlikely that a newer engine is less advanced than an old engine.

You might want to rephrase your second statement. Many great old games are based on old engines. Give me the name of a mainstream game from 2012 that is based on an old engine.
And don't give me a game with a revised version of an old engine (ie Halo Anniversary), I mean with an actual old engine. RR is copy/paste from SFCO, so no revising done there.

Jasoon wrote:

All i'm saying is RR is alot better than RBS, and graphics don't really mean much these days, look at COD...Minecraft....

Engine != graphics. You might want to read up on game mechanics before replying.
Also, I didn't say that graphics meant anything.

Ok, fair enough but did you just try and explain to me that "Engine = Graphics" because i've known that for years...

Jasoon wrote:

Ok, fair enough but did you just try and explain to me that "Engine = Graphics" because i've known that for years...

I said Engine != Graphics...

"=" means equal to.
"!=" mean not equal to.

they haven't changed call of duty's engine since 2007, but I know y'all are all gonna say it isnt a good game so it doesnt matter haha

Treyarch COD Games Are Very Good Because They Actually Update About Everything Except Graphics While IW COD Games Are Getting Shit Becuase They Have No Big Updates At All, MW2 To MW3 Seemed Like A Downgrade